Finance for manufacturers: it depends which stage of the cycle is actually tight

A manufacturer's cash gets tied up in three places before a sale even happens, raw materials, work-in-progress on the shop floor, and finished stock waiting for a buyer, plus a fourth, separate question: machinery and tooling capex. Picking the right finance product starts with working out which of the four is actually the constraint, not defaulting to whichever product a business has used before.

Four different pulls on cash, four different routes

Raw materials and WIP. Cash committed before a sale exists. This is a working-capital question, sized against the production cycle, not against a specific invoice.
Finished stock awaiting a buyer. Similar shape to WIP, cash tied up, no receivable yet, same working-capital routing applies.
A genuine, accepted customer invoice. Once goods are delivered and invoiced, that's a receivable, and invoice finance (see MarketInvoice's whole-of-market comparison) is built specifically for that stage, not the earlier ones.
Machinery, tooling, plant. A capital asset, not a working-capital cycle. Asset finance secured against the equipment itself is usually the better shape, kept separate from the day-to-day facility.

Where this goes wrong

A manufacturer with strong, fast-paying customers can still hit a cash squeeze that invoice finance doesn't touch, because the actual bottleneck is materials and WIP sitting in front of the receivable, not the receivable itself. And blending a machinery purchase into a working-capital request usually produces a facility priced and structured for neither job properly.

FAQs

What's the difference between funding stock and funding a receivable?

Stock and WIP finance funds cash tied up before a sale exists, raw materials bought, part-built product on the shop floor. Invoice finance funds cash owed after a sale exists, a genuine, accepted invoice to a customer. They sit on opposite sides of the same cycle and usually come from different products, sometimes different lenders.

Should machinery be funded the same way as day-to-day stock?

No. Machinery and tooling are capital assets, usually suited to asset finance secured against the equipment itself. Stock and WIP are working capital, cycling faster and usually funded against the trading pattern rather than a specific asset. Blending the two into one request tends to produce a facility that's the wrong shape for either.

We already use invoice finance, why would we need anything else?

Invoice finance only reaches once a receivable exists. If cash is genuinely tied up earlier, in raw materials or WIP, that gap sits upstream of anything invoice finance can touch, and a working-capital facility sized to the production cycle is the more direct fix.

Which finance product fits which stage?

It depends where the actual constraint sits: pre-sale cash tied up in materials or WIP points toward a working-capital facility; a genuine post-sale receivable points toward invoice finance (see MarketInvoice for whole-of-market comparison); a capital purchase points toward asset finance. Most manufacturers need more than one of these at different points, not a single product for everything. FundBiz doesn't route or match enquiries.

Want help finding finance? Send an enquiry and we pass your details to a business finance broker. Limited companies, LLPs and partnerships with four or more partners only.

Talk to a business finance broker about your options

Free, no obligation, about 2 minutes. We pass your enquiry to a business finance broker, who will contact you. FundBiz does not run a credit check.

Step 1 of 3 · Your business

We save your answers as you go. Nothing is sent to a broker until you press "Send my enquiry".

Start typing and we'll search Companies House.

How FundBiz uses your details: privacy notice.

Free to use · No credit check by FundBiz · Limited companies, LLPs and partnerships of 4+